![]() ![]() ![]() There must be plenty of free users that often edit and post to VSCO, which could now abandon VSCO entirely if they can't rely on the tools that they had access to previously. VSCO is also a social media app too, which generally you don't expect to have to pay for, so that is another factor. Should VSCO not just make the app fully subscription-based at this point, rather than an increasingly limited freemium app? Perhaps this move is a stepping stone, in getting rid of free users entirely. Grain adjustments seem like a particularly popular option, now behind a paywall. VSCO are obviously entitled to do what is best for their business and perhaps they are trialling these changes, we don’t know, but it’s not the best customer service. That’s a lot! To suddenly move all of those, what were free features and probably more, into subscription only, with no apparent warning, if the reports are correct, kind of sucks. So what features are we talking about exactly? Based on Reddit and Twitter reports (I have a subscription already so can't easily verify this myself), these VSCO app features are no longer free and are only available via a subscription: Let's have a closer look at what features aren't free anymore and a potential replacement app. ![]() While a subscription unlocks everything in the app as you’d imagine, there have been people using the free features for years, that now get a message “unlock with a VSCO membership” or a similar prompt like from the image above, with no apparent warning these changes were incoming, which seems a bit harsh. VSCO is a popular mobile photo editor app that can be used at no cost but recent reports suggest some free features have now been paywalled. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |